# power factor

The power factor of an AC electric power system is defined as the ratio of the real power flowing to the load to the apparent power, and is a dimensionless number between 0 and 1 (frequently expressed as a percentage, e.g. 0.5 pf = 50% pf). Real power is the capacity of the circuit for performing work in a particular time. Apparent power is the product of the current and voltage of the circuit. Due to energy stored in the load and returned to the source, or due to a non-linear load that distorts the wave shape of the current drawn from the source, the apparent power will be greater than the real power.

In an electric power system, a load with low power factor draws more current than a load with a high power factor for the same amount of useful power transferred. The higher currents increase the energy lost in the distribution system, and require larger wires and other equipment. Because of the costs of larger equipment and wasted energy, electrical utilities will usually charge a higher cost to industrial or commercial customers where there is a low power factor.

### True, Reactive, and Apparent power

We know that reactive loads such as inductors and capacitors dissipate zero power, yet the fact that they drop voltage and draw current gives the deceptive impression that they actually *do* dissipate power. This “phantom power” is called *reactive power*, and it is measured in a unit called *Volt-Amps-Reactive* (VAR), rather than watts. The mathematical symbol for reactive power is (unfortunately) the capital letter Q. The actual amount of power being used, or dissipated, in a circuit is called *true power*, and it is measured in watts (symbolized by the capital letter P, as always). The combination of reactive power and true power is called *apparent power*, and it is the product of a circuit’s voltage and current, without reference to phase angle. Apparent power is measured in the unit of *Volt-Amps* (VA) and is symbolized by the capital letter S.

As a rule, true power is a function of a circuit’s dissipative elements, usually resistances (R). Reactive power is a function of a circuit’s reactance (X). Apparent power is a function of a circuit’s total impedance (Z). Since we’re dealing with scalar quantities for power calculation, any complex starting quantities such as voltage, current, and impedance must be represented by their *polar magnitudes*, not by real or imaginary rectangular components. For instance, if I’m calculating true power from current and resistance, I must use the polar magnitude for current, and not merely the “real” or “imaginary” portion of the current. If I’m calculating apparent power from voltage and impedance, both of these formerly complex quantities must be reduced to their polar magnitudes for the scalar arithmetic.

There are several power equations relating the three types of power to resistance, reactance, and impedance (all using scalar quantities):

Please note that there are two equations each for the calculation of true and reactive power. There are three equations available for the calculation of apparent power, P=IE being useful *only* for that purpose. Examine the following circuits and see how these three types of power interrelate for: a purely resistive load in

a purely reactive load in

and a resistive/reactive load in Figure

Resistive load only:

*True power, reactive power, and apparent power for a purely resistive load.*

Reactive load only:

*True power, reactive power, and apparent power for a purely reactive load.*

Resistive/reactive load:

*True power, reactive power, and apparent power for a resistive/reactive load.*

These three types of power — true, reactive, and apparent — relate to one another in trigonometric form. We call this the *power triangle*: (Figure

*Power triangle relating appearant power to true power and reactive power. *

Using the laws of trigonometry, we can solve for the length of any side (amount of any type of power), given the lengths of the other two sides, or the length of one side and an angle.

**REVIEW:**- Power dissipated by a load is referred to as
*true power*. True power is symbolized by the letter P and is measured in the unit of Watts (W). - Power merely absorbed and returned in load due to its reactive properties is referred to as
*reactive power*. Reactive power is symbolized by the letter Q and is measured in the unit of Volt-Amps-Reactive (VAR). - Total power in an AC circuit, both dissipated and absorbed/returned is referred to as
*apparent power*. Apparent power is symbolized by the letter S and is measured in the unit of Volt-Amps (VA). - These three types of power are trigonometrically related toone another. In a right triangle, P = adjacent length, Q = opposite length, and S = hypotenuse length. The opposite angle is equal to the circuit’s impedance (Z) phase angle.

## Calculating power factor

As was mentioned before, the angle of this “power triangle” graphically indicates the ratio between the amount of dissipated (or *consumed*) power and the amount of absorbed/returned power. It also happens to be the same angle as that of the circuit’s impedance in polar form. When expressed as a fraction, this ratio between true power and apparent power is called the *power factor* for this circuit. Because true power and apparent power form the adjacent and hypotenuse sides of a right triangle, respectively, the power factor ratio is also equal to the cosine of that phase angle. Using values from the last example circuit:

It should be noted that power factor, like all ratio measurements, is a *unitless* quantity.

For the purely resistive circuit, the power factor is 1 (perfect), because the reactive power equals zero. Here, the power triangle would look like a horizontal line, because the opposite (reactive power) side would have zero length.

For the purely inductive circuit, the power factor is zero, because true power equals zero. Here, the power triangle would look like a vertical line, because the adjacent (true power) side would have zero length.

The same could be said for a purely capacitive circuit. If there are no dissipative (resistive) components in the circuit, then the true power must be equal to zero, making any power in the circuit purely reactive. The power triangle for a purely capacitive circuit would again be a vertical line (pointing down instead of up as it was for the purely inductive circuit).

Power factor can be an important aspect to consider in an AC circuit, because any power factor less than 1 means that the circuit’s wiring has to carry more current than what would be necessary with zero reactance in the circuit to deliver the same amount of (true) power to the resistive load. If our last example circuit had been purely resistive, we would have been able to deliver a full 169.256 watts to the load with the same 1.410 amps of current, rather than the mere 119.365 watts that it is presently dissipating with that same current quantity. The poor power factor makes for an inefficient power delivery system.

Poor power factor can be corrected, paradoxically, by adding another load to the circuit drawing an equal and opposite amount of reactive power, to cancel out the effects of the load’s inductive reactance. Inductive reactance can only be canceled by capacitive reactance, so we have to add a *capacitor* in parallel to our example circuit as the additional load. The effect of these two opposing reactances in parallel is to bring the circuit’s total impedance equal to its total resistance (to make the impedance phase angle equal, or at least closer, to zero).

Since we know that the (uncorrected) reactive power is 119.998 VAR (inductive), we need to calculate the correct capacitor size to produce the same quantity of (capacitive) reactive power. Since this capacitor will be directly in parallel with the source (of known voltage), we’ll use the power formula which starts from voltage and reactance:

Let’s use a rounded capacitor value of 22 µF and see what happens to our circuit: (Figure

*Parallel capacitor corrects lagging power factor of inductive load. V2 and node numbers: 0, 1, 2, and 3 are SPICE related, and may be ignored for the moment.*

The power factor for the circuit, overall, has been substantially improved. The main current has been decreased from 1.41 amps to 994.7 milliamps, while the power dissipated at the load resistor remains unchanged at 119.365 watts. Thepower factor is much closer to being 1:

Since the impedance angle is still a positive number, we know that the circuit, overall, is still more inductive than it is capacitive. If our power factor correction efforts had been perfectly on-target, we would have arrived at an impedance angle of exactly zero, or purely resistive. If we had added too large of a capacitor in parallel, we would have ended up with an impedance angle that was negative, indicating that the circuit was more capacitive than inductive.

A SPICE simulation of the circuit of (Figure shows total voltage and total current are nearly in phase. The SPICE circuit file has a zero volt voltage-source (V2) in series with the capacitor so that the capacitor current may be measured. The start time of 200 msec ( instead of 0) in the transient analysis statement allows the DC conditions to stabilize before collecting data. See SPICE listing “pf.cir power factor”.

pf.cir power factor

V1 1 0 sin(0 170 60)

C1 1 3 22uF

v2 3 0 0

L1 1 2 160mH

R1 2 0 60

# resolution stop start

.tran 1m 200m 160m

.end

The Nutmeg plot of the various currents with respect to the applied voltage V_{total} is shown in (Figure The reference is V_{total}, to which all other measurements are compared. This is because the applied voltage, V_{total}, appears across the parallel branches of the circuit. There is no single current common to all components. We can compare those currents to V_{total}.

*Zero phase angle due to in-phase V _{total} and I_{total} . The lagging I_{L} with respect to V_{total} is corrected by a leading I_{C} .*

Note that the total current (I

_{total}) is in phase with the applied voltage (V

_{total}), indicating a phase angle of near zero. This is no coincidence. Note that the lagging current, I

_{L}of the inductor would have caused the total current to have a lagging phase somewhere between (I

_{total}) and I

_{L}. However, the leading capacitor current, I

_{C}, compensates for the lagging inductor current. The result is a total current phase-angle somewhere between the inductor and capacitor currents. Moreover, that total current (I

_{total}) was forced to be in-phase with the total applied voltage (V

_{total}), by the calculation of an appropriate capacitor value.

Since the total voltage and current are in phase, the product of these two waveforms, power, will always be positive throughout a 60 Hz cycle, real power as in Figure

Had the phase-angle not been corrected to zero (PF=1), the product would have been negative where positive portions of one waveform overlapped negative portions of the other as in Figure . Negative power is fed back to the generator. It cannont be sold; though, it does waste power in the resistance of electric lines between load and generator. The parallel capacitor corrects this problem.

Note that reduction of line losses applies to the lines from the generator to the point where the power factor correction capacitor is applied. In other words, there is still circulating current between the capacitor and the inductive load. This is not normally a problem because the power factor correction is applied close to the offending load, like an induction motor.

It should be noted that too much capacitance in an AC circuit will result in a low power factor just as well as too much inductance. You must be careful not to over-correct when adding capacitance to an AC circuit. You must also be

*very*careful to use the proper capacitors for the job (rated adequately for power system voltages and the occasional voltage spike from lightning strikes for continuous AC service, and capable of handling the expected levels of current).

If a circuit is predominantly inductive, we say that its power factor is

*lagging*(because the current wave for the circuit lags behind the applied voltage wave). Conversely, if a circuit is predominantly capacitive, we say that its power factor is

*leading*. Thus, our example circuit started out with a power factor of 0.705 lagging, and was corrected to a power factor of 0.999 lagging.

**REVIEW:**- Poor power factor in an AC circuit may be “corrected”, or re-established at a value close to 1, by adding a parallel reactance opposite the effect of the load’s reactance. If the load’s reactance is inductive in nature (which is almost always will be), parallel
*capacitance*is what is needed to correct poor power factor.

## Practical power factor correction

When the need arises to correct for poor power factor in an AC power system, you probably won’t have the luxury of knowing the load’s exact inductance in henrys to use for your calculations. You may be fortunate enough to have an instrument called a *power factor meter* to tell you what the power factor is (a number between 0 and 1), and the apparent power (which can be figured by taking a voltmeter reading in volts and multiplying by an ammeter reading in amps). In less favorable circumstances you may have to use an oscilloscope to compare voltage and current waveforms, measuring phase shift in *degrees* and calculating power factor by the cosine of that phase shift.

Most likely, you will have access to a wattmeter for measuring true power, whose reading you can compare against a calculation of apparent power (from multiplying total voltage and total current measurements). From the values of true and apparent power, you can determine reactive power and power factor. Let’s do an example problem to see how this works: (Figure )

*Wattmeter reads true power; product of voltmeter and ammeter readings yields appearant power.*

First, we need to calculate the apparent power in kVA. We can do this by multiplying load voltage by load current:

As we can see, 2.308 kVA is a much larger figure than 1.5 kW, which tells us that the power factor in this circuit is rather poor (substantially less than 1). Now, we figure the power factor of this load by dividing the true power by the apparent power:

Using this value for power factor, we can draw a power triangle, and from that determine the reactive power of this load:

*Reactive power may be calculated from true power and appearant power.*

To determine the unknown (reactive power) triangle quantity, we use the Pythagorean Theorem “backwards,” given the length of the hypotenuse (apparent power) and the length of the adjacent side (true power):

If this load is an electric motor, or most any other industrial AC load, it will have a lagging (inductive) power factor, which means that we’ll have to correct for it with a *capacitor* of appropriate size, wired in parallel. Now that we know the amount of reactive power (1.754 kVAR), we can calculate the size of capacitor needed to counteract its effects:

Rounding this answer off to 80 µF, we can place that size of capacitor in the circuit and calculate the results:

*Parallel capacitor corrects lagging (inductive) load.*

An 80 µF capacitor will have a capacitive reactance of 33.157 Ω, giving a current of 7.238 amps, and a corresponding reactive power of 1.737 kVAR (for the capacitor *only*). Since the capacitor’s current is 180^{o} out of phase from the the load’s inductive contribution to curent draw, the capacitor’s reactive power will directly subtract from the load’s reactive power, resulting in:

This correction, of course, will not change the amount of true power consumed by the load, but it will result in a substantial reduction of apparent power, and of the total current drawn from the 240 Volt source: (Figure

*Power triangle before and after capacitor correction.*

The new apparent power can be found from the true and new reactive power values, using the standard form of the Pythagorean Theorem:

This gives a corrected power factor of (1.5kW / 1.5009 kVA), or 0.99994, and a new total current of (1.50009 kVA / 240 Volts), or 6.25 amps, a substantial improvement over the uncorrected value of 9.615 amps! This lower total current will translate to less heat losses in the circuit wiring, meaning greater system efficiency (less power wasted).

why they charge more bill if we use at low power factor rather than higher power factor

why they charge more bill if we use at low power factor rather than higher power factor

Power factor – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The power factor of an AC electric power system is defined as the ratio of the real power flowing to the load to the apparent power, [1] [2] and is a dimensionless number …

In such cases, active or passive power factor correction may be used to counteract the distortion and raise the power factor. The devices for correction of the power factor may be at a central substation, spread out over a distribution system, or built into power-consuming equipment. …

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor

What is power factor?

Power factor is the ratio of true power or watts to apparent power or volt amps. They are identical only when current and voltage are in phase than the power factor is …

If the true power is 1870 watts and the volt amp reading is 2200. Than the power factor is 0.85 or 85 percent. True power divided by apparent power. The …

Thus power factors of 0.8 are the same as 80 percent. Low power factor is usually associated with motors and transformers. An …

http://masterslic.tripod.com/FAQ-2/22.html

Power Factor – facts vs fiction

Article: Dispelling myths about Power Factor.

Power factor is one of those subjects about which there seems to be a great deal of confusion and many misconceptions. The culprit is the the assertion that power factor = cos(Phi), Phi being the phase shift between voltage and current. While this is true under certain …

This article will give you a basic introduction into power factor, and explain why cos(Phi) is not the whole answer. Circuit .6K …

http://www.splatco.com/tips/pwrfact/pfarticl.htm

Power Factor for a Three-Phase Electrical Motor

The power factor of an AC electric power system is defined as the ratio of the active (true or real) power to the apparent power …

It is common to define the Power Factor – PF – as the cosine of the phase angle between voltage and current – or the “cosφ”. …

A low power factor is the result of inductive loads such as transformers and electric motors. Unlike resistive loads creating heat by consuming kilowatts, inductive loads require a current …

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/power-factor-electrical-motor-d_654.html

UNDERSTANDING POWER FACTOR

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View

by L Wuidart – Cited by 3 – Related articles

worry about Power Factor (P.F.). P.F. is something you learnt one day at school in. your Electrotechnics course”as being cos ϕ. This conventional definition is only valid when …

The unity power factor beneficiaries. Both of the user and the Electricity distribution. company take advantage from a unity power fac- …

Figure 2: Reactive and distortion power produce extra RMS currents leading to copper area oversize. APPLICATION NOTE …

http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/4042.pdf

Power Factor for AC Power

From the phasor diagram for AC impedance, it can be seen that the power factor is R/Z. For a purely resistive AC circuit, R=Z and the power factor = …

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/powfac.html

Reducing Power Factor Cost

Low power factor is caused by inductive loads (such as transformers, electric motors, and high-intensity discharge. lighting), which are a major portion …

In the diagram below, the power triangle shows an initial 0.70 power factor for a 100-kW (real power) inductive load. The reactive power required by the load is …

power correction factor and to correctly locate and install capacitors in your electrical distribution system. Capacitance. Real power …

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/pdfs/mc60405.pdf

Power factor – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The power factor of an AC electric power system is defined as the ratio of the real power flowing to the load to the apparent power, [1] [2] and is a dimensionless number …

In such cases, active or passive power factor correction may be used to counteract the distortion and raise the power factor. The devices for correction of the power factor may be at a central substation, spread out over a distribution system, or built into power-consuming equipment. …

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor

What is power factor?

Power factor is the ratio of true power or watts to apparent power or volt amps. They are identical only when current and voltage are in phase than the power factor is …

If the true power is 1870 watts and the volt amp reading is 2200. Than the power factor is 0.85 or 85 percent. True power divided by apparent power. The …

Thus power factors of 0.8 are the same as 80 percent. Low power factor is usually associated with motors and transformers. An …

http://masterslic.tripod.com/FAQ-2/22.html

Power Factor – facts vs fiction

Article: Dispelling myths about Power Factor.

Power factor is one of those subjects about which there seems to be a great deal of confusion and many misconceptions. The culprit is the the assertion that power factor = cos(Phi), Phi being the phase shift between voltage and current. While this is true under certain …

This article will give you a basic introduction into power factor, and explain why cos(Phi) is not the whole answer. Circuit .6K …

http://www.splatco.com/tips/pwrfact/pfarticl.htm

Power Factor for a Three-Phase Electrical Motor

The power factor of an AC electric power system is defined as the ratio of the active (true or real) power to the apparent power …

It is common to define the Power Factor – PF – as the cosine of the phase angle between voltage and current – or the “cosφ”. …

A low power factor is the result of inductive loads such as transformers and electric motors. Unlike resistive loads creating heat by consuming kilowatts, inductive loads require a current …

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/power-factor-electrical-motor-d_654.html

UNDERSTANDING POWER FACTOR

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View

by L Wuidart – Cited by 3 – Related articles

worry about Power Factor (P.F.). P.F. is something you learnt one day at school in. your Electrotechnics course”as being cos ϕ. This conventional definition is only valid when …

The unity power factor beneficiaries. Both of the user and the Electricity distribution. company take advantage from a unity power fac- …

Figure 2: Reactive and distortion power produce extra RMS currents leading to copper area oversize. APPLICATION NOTE …

http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/4042.pdf

Power Factor for AC Power

From the phasor diagram for AC impedance, it can be seen that the power factor is R/Z. For a purely resistive AC circuit, R=Z and the power factor = …

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/powfac.html

Reducing Power Factor Cost

Low power factor is caused by inductive loads (such as transformers, electric motors, and high-intensity discharge. lighting), which are a major portion …

In the diagram below, the power triangle shows an initial 0.70 power factor for a 100-kW (real power) inductive load. The reactive power required by the load is …

power correction factor and to correctly locate and install capacitors in your electrical distribution system. Capacitance. Real power …

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/pdfs/mc60405.pdf

Very helpful, Thank you!

Very helpful, Thank you!